GMAT Essay Suggestions: 3 Keys to a Excessive AWA Rating

Most web sites, books, and take a look at prep programs providing GMAT Essay ideas do little greater than state the apparent. Suggestions like “handle your time,” “construction your essay,” “use transitions,” and many others. apply to any timed writing task and ignore the specificity of the GMAT AWA, which requires that test-takers analyze an argument. So as to obtain a excessive rating on the AWA, it’s subsequently very important that test-takers perceive the weather of an argument and never simply the weather of fine writing. The three GMAT Essay ideas launched under precede the weather of fine writing: they’re crucial for figuring out which concepts in an argument require higher focus and for establishing a logical Essay construction.

GMAT Essay Tip #1: Perceive the Construction of an Argument

On the most elementary degree, an argument consists of two parts: premises (additionally known as causes or grounds) and a conclusion (additionally known as a declare). The conclusion is the primary level the argument is attempting to persuade the viewers to simply accept (e.g., {that a} sure motion ought to be taken, that one of the best ways to perform “x” is by “y,” and many others.). The premises, alternatively, are the explanations or assist used to justify the conclusion. Premises are statements believed to be true, however which haven’t been confirmed and will, in reality, be logically suspect. In a logically legitimate argument, the premises should be related to the conclusion and the conclusion should essentially comply with from the premises.

So as to assist illustrate the excellence between an argument’s premises and conclusion, contemplate the next instance:

The marketplace for the luxury-goods trade is on the decline. Latest experiences present {that a} increased unemployment charge, coupled with shopper fears, has decreased the amount of cash the common family spends on each important and nonessential objects, however particularly on nonessential objects. Since luxurious items are, by nature, nonessential, this market would be the first to lower within the current financial local weather, and luxurious retailers ought to refocus their consideration to lower-priced markets.

On this argument, the conclusion is that “retailers ought to refocus their consideration to lower-priced markets.” The conclusion relies on the next premises: 1) that the upper unemployment charge and shopper fears has led to a lower within the buy of important and nonessential objects; 2) that luxurious items are non-essential objects, and; 3) that the decline within the buy of non-essential objects has been/can be higher than the decline in important objects.

Recognizing the excellence between an argument’s conclusions and premises is critical as a way to precisely summarize an argument, decide which factors deserve emphasis, and successfully show an argument’s invalidity. In accordance with the GMAT scoring standards, to obtain a rating of 5 or 6 (the best attainable rating) on the AWA, the Essay should “clearly establish necessary options of the argument and analyze them insightfully.” It’s unimaginable to insightfully analyze an argument if you’re specializing in tangential factors and are unable to clarify the connection between the varied factors offered.

See also  Significance of Proofreading a Masters Dissertation

To higher perceive the issues that may come up from not understanding the construction of an argument, contemplate this introduction from an Essay on the above argument: “The argument that the posh items trade is on the decline because of increased unemployment charges and shopper fears shouldn’t be logically convincing as a result of it is determined by three questionable assumptions.” On this case, the author confuses a single premise with “the argument” and utterly fails to handle the conclusion of the argument – a very powerful level that accounts for why the opposite factors are related within the first place. Irrespective of how well-written this Essay seems to be, it is going to by no means earn a rating above a 3.5 or 4: it’s doomed from the start because of the author’s lack of ability to precisely summarize the argument and concentrate on its most necessary options.

GMAT Essay Tip #2: Critique the Premises Earlier than the Conclusion

This isn’t to counsel, alternatively, {that a} author shouldn’t concentrate on difficult an argument’s premises or that premises are unimportant parts of an argument. Nevertheless, it is very important do not forget that the target is to not problem a premise merely for its personal sake, however to sever the connection between the premise and the conclusion that the argument makes an attempt to determine.

As a result of an argument’s conclusion relies on the premises, it’s extra logical to start by first critiquing the premises earlier than tackling the conclusion head on. After declaring an issue with a premise, nevertheless, the author wants to handle the connection (or lack thereof) between the premise and the argument’s conclusion by explaining how the precise downside recognized with the premise calls into query the argument’s conclusion.

To higher perceive the issues related to addressing the conclusion earlier than the premises, contemplate the next first two paragraphs from an essay:

The argument is made at a gathering of the administrators of an organization that manufactures elements for heavy equipment, throughout a dialogue of the corporate’s declining revenues. Delays in manufacturing are believed to be the reason for the falling revenues as apparently each the delays in manufacturing and the decline in income occurred on the similar time. The manufacturing delays are attributed to the poor planning in buying metals by the buying supervisor, who has a superb background in enterprise, psychology, and sociology, however lacks a scientific understanding of metals. Because of this, it’s suggested that the corporate exchange the present supervisor with a scientist from the analysis division. This argument makes many assumptions and fails to offer details about different components that might be liable for the failing revenues. Therefore, this argument is flawed and unconvincing.

Firstly, it assumes that the scientist from the analysis division would have all the mandatory prerequisite enterprise associated information required to run the buying division. It assumes that there is not going to be any issues close to the stock administration and that scientific information is ample to deal with the stock administration. That is unconvincing as no data is supplied concerning the coaching that the scientist can be supplied on the stock administration or concerning the attainable transition of information from the supervisor to the scientist. The argument will be strengthened if details about coaching or transition is supplied.

Whereas the author does a superb job summarizing the argument (maybe even in an excessive amount of element for an introduction) and clearly acknowledges how the conclusion emerges from a number of problematic premises, the author’s determination to problem the conclusion within the second paragraph versus later within the Essay undercuts the author’s in any other case robust reasoning. Whereas the primary a number of sentences of the second paragraph make legitimate factors, the factors being made are all tangential to the primary points: the trigger(s) for the decline in income and the trigger(s) for the delays in manufacturing. By starting with the conclusion, the author within the above instance is implying the validity of the argument’s premises, for there isn’t a logical foundation for contemplating changing the current supervisor until each premises about the reason for the difficulties have been true. As paragraphs three and 4 really problem each premises, the author is undercutting his/her personal critique by starting from a place the place each premises are implied to be legitimate.

See also  Similarity Between Writing a 5 Paragraph Essay and an Article

As a basic rule, it’s best to critique concepts in an argument within the order that they’re offered in order that the connection between concepts will be critiqued as effectively (the exception being circumstances the place the conclusion of an argument is offered earlier than the premises). Within the above instance, the author ought to have first challenged the concept that the decline in revenues is owing to the manufacturing delays, after which within the third paragraph challenged the premise that the supervisor’s lack of scientific background was liable for the manufacturing delays. The factors within the present second paragraph can be launched in a fourth paragraph, that will start with one thing like: “Even when we have been to simply accept that the decline in revenues is because of the manufacturing delays, and that the current buying supervisor’s lack of scientific information has been liable for the manufacturing delays, there’s nonetheless no motive to imagine that changing the current buying supervisor with a scientist is the most effective resolution… “

By critiquing the premises earlier than the conclusion, the author can be constructing momentum and logical drive. The author’s critique of the premises would all be working to indicate how the conclusion is problematic, and the conclusion of the Essay can be a lot stronger. The author would have a number of grounds for difficult the argument’s conclusion, versus the presently weak, tangential reasoning provided in paragraph two.

GMAT Writing Tip #3: Know the Completely different Logical Fallacies

As there are near 150 official GMAT AWA subjects, it’s troublesome if not unimaginable to arrange for the examination by writing a follow Essay on every. Neither is this actually essential or advisable. A greater strategy can be to familiarize your self with the widespread logical flaws, or logical fallacies, that seem within the official AWA subjects, so that you could instantly establish the main errors in reasoning within the argument you’re requested to critique in your official GMAT examination.

See also  Songwriting Tip - Conquering Writers Block

As an example, each premises within the argument above calling for the alternative of the buying supervisor are examples of the fallacy of false trigger: each premises posit a trigger and impact relationship between two separate occasions or situations based mostly merely on their coincidence in time or a correlation. A lot of the official AWA arguments repeat a handful of logical fallacies which can be far simpler to memorize than the 100 plus arguments themselves.

Good GMAT prep programs and books will cowl the most typical fallacies (there’s inadequate area to do an enough job right here). When you memorize them, follow figuring out the actual fallacy in an argument by working via the listing of official subjects. Most significantly, follow explaining why a particular concept is logically invalid and the way the fallacy undermines the conclusion of the argument. As soon as once more, the aim is to not merely level out that there’s particular logical fallacy in an argument, however fairly to clarify how this explicit logical fallacy calls into query the validity of the argument’s conclusion.

Hopefully the GMAT Essay ideas launched on this article assist make clear that what distinguishes a high-scoring from a low-scoring AWA is one thing way more substantial than a author’s potential to construction their essay, use transitions, and keep away from grammatical errors. To put in writing a superb critique of an argument, a author should perceive the construction of an argument and what constitutes a logically legitimate versus an invalid conclusion. Solely then can a author precisely summarize and successfully analyze the connection between the concepts offered.

You May Also Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *